CD3+CD4-CD8- T cells in pediatric leukemia
Main Article Content
Authors
Kuanysh Dossybayeva
School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
Dana Tleugozhina
School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
Gulsamal Zhubanova
School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
Assel Mussayeva
School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
Assem Kurmangali
School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
Ayana Ablayeva
University Medical Center, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
Dair Nurgaliyev
University Medical Center, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
Zabira Kyzdarbekova
University Medical Center, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
Kundyz Shaykhyzada
University Medical Center, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
Galiya Nauryzbayeva
University Medical Center, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
Ulbolsyn Orumbayeva
University Medical Center, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
Kadisha Nurgaliyeva
University Medical Center, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
Matthew Tanko
School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
Dimitri Poddighe
School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
Lyudmila Akhmaltdinova
School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
Abstract
Background: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common malignancy in children [1]. The treatment of relapsed or refractory ALL is associated with severe toxicity, and there is a need for accurate and clinically useful biomarkers to predict risk of recurrence and overall outcome [2, 3]. We hypothesize that CD3+CD4-CD8- T (DNT) cells could potentially serve as predictive biomarkers to better understand patient prognosis and offer risk-adapted therapy.
Materials and methods: 74 children with ALL aged 2-18 and 96 age and gender-matched healthy controls participated in this single-center, cross-sectional study. The patients were stratified according to disease outcome (relapse, remission) and risk group (standard, intermediate, or high risk). Flow cytometry was used to quantify DNT cells in the peripheral blood of study participants. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Results: High-risk patients had the lowest number of DNT cell count (30 [19; 76] x106/L), followed by intermediate-risk (53 [35; 76] x106/L) and standard-risk (63 [41;82] x106/L) patients, p < 0.0001. In comparison, the control group had the highest absolute number of DNT cells (133 [94; 190] x106/L). Patients with relapse (39 [12; 82] x106/L) and in remission (53 [30; 76] x106/L) had significantly lower counts of DNT cells compared to the control group (133 [94; 190] x106/L), p < 0.0001.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that low counts of DNT cells are potentially associated with poor prognosis in children with ALL. Additional studies are needed to further confirm our finding and its immunological significance, and to elucidate the potential role of DNT cells in ALL.
Acknowledgement: We thank Dr. Tanko and Dr. Poddighe for supervision and guidance.
Key words: acute lymphoblastic leukemia, double-negative T cells, flow cytometry
References:
- Hunger, S. P., & Mullighan, C. G. Redefining ALL classification: Toward detecting high- risk ALL and implementing precision medicine. Blood, 125(26), 3977-3987 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-02-580043
- Rheingold, S. R., Bhojwani, D., Ji, L., Xu, X., Devidas, M., Kairalla, J. A., Shago, M., Heerema, N. A., Carroll, A. J., Breidenbach, H., Borowitz, M., Wood, B. L., Angiolillo, A. L., Asselin, B. L., Paul, B. W., Brown, P., Dreyer, Z. E., Dunsmore, K. P., Hilden, J. M., & Larsen, E. Determinants of survival after first relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children’s Oncology Group study. Leukemia, 1–13 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375- 024-02395-4
- Adomako, J., Jiménez-Camacho, K. E., Correa-Lara, M. V., Núñez-Enriquez, J. C., & Schnoor, M. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia relapse: Biomarkers, hopes, and challenges. Trends in Molecular Medicine (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2025.04.005